Unlocking Revenue: How Data Overlays Are Transforming Content Monetization in Live Streaming
Loading Video...
Preparing the interview
Complete interview transcript & analysis below
Enhanced transcript with interviewer insights
INTERVIEWER
Second, yeah, so, uh. For the last 24 months, I would like you to focus on what is the most interesting thing that you have learned about your customers in the last 24 months.
CANDIDATE
OK. So this is less of a situation potentially, but just more of a broad stroke with some specifics, right? Yeah, that's fine. Yeah. So, one of the things that um I have been leading is obviously the OTT CTV uh space within our company, focusing on live streaming. And what we are finding out through focus groups that I've set up and or kind of partner councils that we try to make interactive and bring some of our top uh accounts together as well as some prospects, is that data is really becoming a key. Component to how these players want to start monetizing their content, because with what's upcoming, um, with, you know, cookies going away, some of the IP addresses getting truncated, some of those identifiers for devices and or people, um, what we need to start doing is getting a little bit more data overlay for understanding the content and the audience behind it. So, one of the things that we are looking at currently are integrations with some of these partners and how to help them. So, to give you a quick example is for example, if we are currently monetizing specific content at about $20 right? If we can overlay data. And figure out how to charge it to the advertiser. We can then make $2 to $5 extra, which brings in more revenue for the publishers or the publishers' accounts, right? But also makes that that that supports the thesis that their inventory is actually more valuable because there is more data available to understand the profile of the content as well as the audience. So I think that's been opening up um a lot of doors internally to really change the or shift the thinking of how we're looking at data. Let me, let me pause.
Interviewer Insight
the candidate will need to do a better job of walking through your situation. They did not appropriately level set with the interviewer how much knowledge they have the space, and therefore what gets lost in this answer is what is actually important. This specific question was around what was the most interesting thing that the candidate has learned about their customers will last 24 months, and that got lost in this answer. Separately, the candidate missed an opportunity to present any metrics or level setting data that would give a sense of the scope of this opportunity.
INTERVIEWER
Yeah, so I'm not, I'm not sure I understood the, the flow there. Uh, what you're trying to do is. In the summary reports that you give back to the content owners about who was watching the data, that's, that's where you're putting the data overlay.
CANDIDATE
Yeah, so the data overlay goes to them because they have their own, uh, direct sales teams, right? And they're trying to reach out to advertisers and strike up deals with, uh, you know, Honda, Pepsi, Kellogg, etc. But there are some advertisers that they don't know that are buying their inventory, right? So we're trying to overlay data and give it back to them to show them who is the full profile of the advertisers that are looking at it, but also representing the content better to the advertisers themselves so they can pay a higher dollar for it, to pay a premium for it. So it kind of goes both ways.
INTERVIEWER
Got it. And so,
CANDIDATE
because we're, we're operating a marketplace, right? And, and our job is to represent the inventory at the highest value to the advertiser, but also show to the extent that the publisher or the account has direct sales to enhance their direct sales with some of the data that we can provide back to them in terms of insights and reports.
INTERVIEWER
And so, when you think about like, you know, the way the question was framed, it was, you know, walk me through the most interesting thing you've learned about your customers in the last 2 months. What, what about this? Elicits the notion of most interesting to you.
CANDIDATE
Why is, why, yeah, so why it is most interesting is because over the last couple of years, one thing that we've seen is everybody just trying to plug into as many partners that monetize their platforms as possible, right? And that's not really a sustainable business model, because if you think about it, if you have, let's just for simplicity's sake, two partners. Both of them are most likely going to be reaching out to Honda and Pepsi on your behalf, right? So that doesn't really differentiate it. It doesn't bring you the the density of demand that you're looking for. So, really the differentiator here is the data that you have on top of what everybody else has, right? So, like, some something that we have at Yahoo is first party data, consented data from Mail, as well as receipts that nobody else has. So, to really leverage that is something that we, uh, we've been talking to our partners about and kind of uncovering some of those nuggets. But listen, currently, what we're doing is trying to plug in as many partners into an auction is not really working. Let's really figure out what those differentiators are, and really the power of data and the value of data is where the conversations have been going.
Interviewer Insight
this is not really a direct answer that question. It's a bit vague and lacks meaning for someone outside of the ad tech space.
INTERVIEWER
So with all of that in mind, right, if you could start today on a new thing for, for, for these customers with this issue, and you had a free hand in designing a new set of functionality, where would you put your attention first?
CANDIDATE
It's really understanding what data they would like to see, right? Because there are, there's so many different partnerships that our teams are involved in, that they could bring in for, you know, measurement and attribution, and, uh, you know, understanding the audiences better, and mail receipts, and, you know, viewership patterns, right? How the audience kind of engages. It's really try to understand the value of the verticals of the data, and then try to figure out like how to squeeze more, more lemon juice out of that. That makes sense.
Interviewer Insight
simply too high level.
INTERVIEWER
Uh, it's a bit vague, if I'm being honest, right? I mean, you just said give them more data. Not really. No, so, so,
CANDIDATE
so to understand the verticals, right? Is, is the measurement component more, more important, right? Is the attribution component more important? Is the audience, uh, level at the auction, uh, more important? Is it the insights that we would provide kind of post-measurement to the publisher that's more important, and then the whole gamut of like how to run. The specific pieces of data and and what priority, right? Because there's just so much data, right? Experian data, TransUnion data, Hill receipts data, and all of them are used for different purposes. So it's, it's really trying to narrow down like what is the most important data partner, right? And how do we leverage that to get the best value for the customer.
Expert Assessment
Interviewer assessment - would be used in a hiring meeting
as a first answer block, the candidate performed at L6 level. That was a lack of structure and a lack of context which made the answer somewhat complicated to follow for someone who has high degree of ad tech experience. Candidate could have done a better job of outlining what the specific customer problems were and why they found an interesting. When asked direct questions about this, the candidate remained too high level which gives the impression that they are not obsessing over the customer, but rather dealing with issues as they come.