How This Principal BizDev Candidate Turned a Last-Minute Requirement Crisis into a Successful Deal Closure

Published Thursday, September 24, 2026
Live Interview
Expert Analysis Included
Full Transcript

Loading Video...

Preparing the interview

Complete interview transcript & analysis below

Enhanced transcript with interviewer insights

INTERVIEWER

Interviewer

So, the company you're going to work for, I try to avoid naming names, uh, on purpose, but you know who we're talking about that you're gonna be looping for is, uh, notorious for, we'll call it charitably a relentless, uh, work pace. Uh, so, part of the requirements for someone at the principal, uh, level, uh, and above, uh, is managing teams. Um, and from, from looking at the resume, it looks like you've managed teams in the past, so this, this should be fine, as far as the question, but if, if that was an incorrect read of your resume, just let me know now, OK. You manage teams, yes? Yeah, perfect, perfect. Um, so, um. Uh, you know, one of the hard things about working in an environment such as the one you're, you're targeting is that, uh, oftentimes you're asked to do things, uh, where you're being given a Uh, deliverable or a task or a thing that you need to get done that oftentimes requires you to get things done from other teams over whom you don't have managerial control, which makes things. We'll charitably call it complicated. So, uh, I'd like to talk about a time where you were working with a team over whom you did not have managerial control, direct managerial control, but, uh, they were not moving fast enough for you to achieve your targets, your goals, right? Uh, what was the situation and what did you do?

CANDIDATE

Candidate

So talk about a time where, um.

INTERVIEWER

Interviewer

A team you needed to execute wasn't executing fast enough, but it wasn't a team that you could go yell at somebody and be like, hey dude, I'm your boss, get it done.

CANDIDATE

Candidate

Makes sense. OK. This is when, um, I was at Boeing. I was in business development again we're back on the Singapore deal. Um, I already Give you the background. I'm not gonna, I could go to the background again, but essentially now we're 1 month away from closing the deal. Um, as I mentioned, we're squared away on requirements and we're 1 month left and I'm with my capture team. So you can think of a capture team of a 4-member team. Um, you have the chief engineer, uh, that was me at the time. Um, we had the program manager, um, you had your retired Air Force pilot, and you also have a legalese folks, and so 4 of us are down there. We're about to celebrate. They're about to close the contract. And we're sitting in the room and uh Pei Chu, I remember this clearly, the Singaporean PM uh was excited we're about to close the deal and she said there's one more thing, um, we need to levy about 125 requirements that our airworthiness team needs satisfied before we can fly aircraft in Singapore. What airworthiness means is they're like the FAA of the US and they give the check for them to fly or not. A little to set the benchmark, it took us 2 years to take 200 requirements from Singapore and work them all out. We have a month left and I have to work with my engineers back in the US and trying to resolve the 125 airworthiness requirements. First thing I did was I asked Page you, can I, can I quickly see these requirements? Um, it was Monday morning, um, I think 9 or 10 Singaporean time, and she said, Sure. I went into a different conference room and I quickly perused these 125 requirements. After I reviewed them, there were two things I was looking at. One, Are there requirements that I can estimate for the other teams, and 2, what are the requirements that I can't really estimate because of potential scope creep or my lack of understanding of the technology? After about an hour or two right before lunchtime, I came back into the room and, and, and told them that I'm gonna need about a week since Monday. By next Monday, we should have a good answer of how we're going to incorporate this into the contract. I got a ping on my laptop from Ed Palle, who was the, the capture team lead, and he, and he put down, let's make it Wednesday, smiley face. Uh, so now I have to, um, work with our engineering team in the US specifically, I have to work with the engineering managers who are responsible for meeting these requirements that are impacted by it and ask them to see how we can incorporate this without increasing the cost. A little background, um, our Boeing CFO made a deal with Singapore that they would sell them 8 helicopters for half a billion dollars at the high level. And the way Boeing would make a profit would be we'd be selling them baseline helicopters with the cost of the upgrade. Now I'm gonna go to these engineers who've already set the price for the contract and we already had a place and ask them without reducing cost, can you satisfy these or what was the minimal cost? I knew I was gonna get a lot of pushback, um, just historically when you get unknown requirements, a lot of people push back, so I have to be careful. So the first thing I had to do was, um, craft my message carefully for the managers to make sure they understand the urgency, and I asked them rather than giving me hours. To look at past programs, um, in the past, so look at our Army, Navy, and other international programs where we tested these requirements and if we can use that same test data to substantiate these requirements, rationale here was if I can use that test data, I didn't have to increase the hours and really keep the cost of the upgrades low. I remember Ed McKeever. He's like, Yeah, great, we'll do it. I'm gonna need like 23 weeks. I can't. How am I gonna just pull up reports out of the blue? I'm like, I'm gonna do it. I'm gonna, Ed, I'm gonna need it within 24 hours. Got him in his back pocket. Yeah, Ed's like, he laughed. He's like, Are you serious? I'm like, Ed, we're trying to really close the deal. We're trying to make Boeing's 4th quarter earnings. He's like, Look, we're fine. I don't know. I mean, do you have any idea? I'm like, let me talk to Phil. Phil was the technical lead at that time. I'm like, let me work with Phil. Let me work with Andy. And so now I'm bringing Andy back in the picture. Uh, Andy now knows Singapore really well. Let's work together and see what we can do. I'll have Andy go through all the requirements and have Phil, um, work with us to understand which ones we can substantiate, which ones we cannot. Uh, we're at 9 p.m. Monday night. Um, I work probably to 2, 2 a.m. Singaporean time, which was 20 p.m. uh Boeing time, grabbed a four-hour nap, woke up, um, Tuesday 9:00 a.m., um, which was 9 p.m. now in Boeing US time, and me, Andy, Ed, we got Ed back on the call, and the result there was that out of the 125, we were down to 30 requirements that I had to review. Out of the 30, there were 5 that we couldn't substantiate with the customer.

INTERVIEWER

Interviewer

There

CANDIDATE

Candidate

were

INTERVIEWER

Interviewer

5 that you could or could not.

CANDIDATE

Candidate

We could not. We could not use that test report. And, and at this point I asked Ed, like, Ed, give me a slag, very conservative. Give me a number that you can give me. Ed gave me a number, um, and I took that number back to Ed Pallock, who was the business lead, um, before we went to the meeting, told Ed, like, Ed, it's gonna be around 500 hours that Ed's gonna need to substantiate these requirements. Ed looked at me and he's like. All right, we're gonna do that, but they're gonna have to take a 10% cost reduction in those hours. So, um, we're looking around close like 450. Um, I pinged Ed back. Ed laughed. He's like, yeah, I kind of figured I worked with Ed before. We'll take it. We'll do the 450. I padded enough that it'd be able to handle it. We, uh, my result, um, we presented to the Singaporean government and they were not happy. They looked at me like, wait, you're not going to test these. You're going to use prior test data to substant these requirements. I told Page Chu that look, we've done these requirements in the past. We have a helicopter that we built 4 or 5 years ago, has close to 5000 flying hours. We have test data that we can give you that are very standard test data that even your Singaporean engineers can understand. But there are 5 that we don't have data on. Those are the 5 that we're gonna inherit, and, and Patriot, it actually helps you because By doing, by substantiating these requirements, we can help reduce the delays in production and in testing, so you'll get your aircraft sooner than what was planned. However, these 5, let's work together and see how we can resolve them. Uh, she's like, All right, let me think about it. Uh, they came back a week later, uh, they worked with the engineers. They accepted the 5. There were 2 more though that they just weren't happy with the flight test data. Uh, these were radio requirements, um, that they needed, um, us to test only because the mission of these helicopters were to be used in an area where there's a lot of radio frequencies. Uh, so we worked with our comms manager at that time. Um, same story. Ask him that, look, we can't substantiate it. Are you going to be able to do this in the timeline? Um, he's like, fine, um, but it's gonna cost as many hours. Uh, Ed was fine with it, um, and then we're able to quickly close the contract, uh, in time to meet our 4th quarter earnings.

INTERVIEWER

Interviewer

Got it. OK. Um, So the, the root of the question was, Working with a team that wasn't moving fast enough. And, you know, the unstated intent of that was they were being intransigent, right, being difficult to work with, but it sounds like in this specific instance that, you know, the example you use is more that the team was put into a position where they weren't used to working at the pace you needed, but they were willing to do it because it needed to get done. Is that, is that a fair summary?

CANDIDATE

Candidate

Yeah, so before going to Ed, I had to be careful. I wanted to guard the deal's time, right? I knew going in there that there was going to be pushback. This is not the first time they're estimating. Um, we're at a time at Boeing where we were making a lot of international deals. And so I knew that if I went in there and asked them to look at all 125, they would just pad the hours like, yeah, that's great. And so already knowing the pushback that I would get, I had to prepare myself accordingly. And so I did the due diligence first before approaching them. I don't manage Ed or his team, um, and so I asked, I had to be careful. I wanted to craft. I worked with, uh, Phil before and Phil's a member of Ed's team and so. Rather than asking Ed to substantiate everything, I already gave him a plan, like, look, I know you're going to push back. I've worked with Phil in the past. Here's the plan. Here's the process. If you do this, let's come back. I'm not going to give Ed your final numbers. Let's meet up on Tuesday morning. I'll tell you what we're able to do and what was not able to do, and that's how we got that final 5 requirements that we couldn't really estimate appropriately.

INTERVIEWER

Interviewer

OK, I'm just looking at

Interviewer Insight

again, very long answers for an interview. These are good stories, but there is a bit of non-linearity to the route in story telling. Will be telling to look at time codes for this answer. Beyond this issue, the "not working fast enough" wasn't sufficient conveyed. It seemed that this is a story with a short time window but not one where a team or team member was failing to perform.

Interviewer Insight

overall, this answer block fails to deliver on the premise of the question and did not really demonstrate a Bias for Action.

Expert Assessment

Interviewer assessment - would be used in a hiring meeting

The candidate did not sufficiently demonstrate Bias for Action in the question block for this leadership principle. The main point of the question used was to look for times where the candidate sped results due to poor action by non-controlled teams. This was not presented. What was presented was a short timeline situation, which is fine, and the candidate demonstrated some initiative in the approach to the solution, but there was nothing in the answer that demonstrated that the candidate has demonstrated high Bias for Action.

Use this feedback to improve your own approach
How This Principal BizDev Candidate Turned a Last-Minute Requirement Crisis into a Successful Deal Closure | Bias for Action | CalmInterview